New Report: Climate Change Will End Human Civilization by 2050

A new report, published by the Breakthrough National Centre for Climate Restoration, a think-tank in Melbourne, Australia, describes climate change as “a near- to a mid-term existential threat to human civilization” and lays out a scenario where human civilization could end over the next 30 years.

If you want to be afraid of something, be more afraid of the people pushing this narrative on everyone. It is the official narrative and the only one acceptable anymore. The “powers that shouldn’t be” have narrowed acceptable to thought and critical thinking about manmade climate change, and this is it.

“Cultural Schizophrenia”: US Media No Longer Reports Facts, But Appeals To Emotions

 

A harrowing scenario analysis of how human civilization might collapse in coming decades due to climate change has been endorsed by a former Australian defense chief and senior royal navy commander. –Vice

Translation: a government official in a different government believes other governments’ “official narrative.” Shocking.

According to the report, the author claims that the potentially “extremely serious outcomes” of climate-related security threats are often far more probable than conventionally assumed, but almost impossible to quantify because they “fall outside the human experience of the last thousand years.” The report warns that “planetary and human systems [are] reaching a ‘point of no return’ by mid-century, in which the prospect of a largely uninhabitable Earth leads to the breakdown of nations and the international order.”

What a surprise! it looks like a government official is upset that climate change could break up the monopoly on violence government currently has. Interesting. No wonder they felt the need to push this propaganda piece and scare the sheep. In the scenario, according to Vice, in which the Earth warms 3 degrees Celcius, some one billion people would be forced to attempt to relocate from unlivable conditions, and two billion would face scarcity of water supplies. Agriculture would collapse in the sub-tropics, and food production would suffer dramatically worldwide. The internal cohesion of nation-states like the US and China would unravel. (Isn’t’ this all already happening? We have the trade war threatening cohesion, and U.S. farmers are behind on food production this year. Just sayin’; maybe it’s not climate change.)

Let’s not pretend that the government’s of the world aren’t already destroying the Earth through geoengineering too. Geoengineering: Waging Weather Warfare on World Populations

“Even for 2°C of warming, more than a billion people may need to be relocated and in high-end scenarios, the scale of destruction is beyond our capacity to model with a high likelihood of human civilization coming to an end,” the report noted.

 

Of course, this doesn’t mean we shouldn’t try to leave our planet in better condition that we found it.  Personally, I use reusable shopping bags when I get groceries and I recycle and try to leave as little waste as possible. I don’t do these things out of fear of being punished by the government, rather, I personally find them the right things to do. Climate change alarmists are good for one thing: once in a while, they’ll have a good idea about how to better care for the planet if you can get past their propaganda pushing.

But I’ll leave you with this:

Study: Global Warming Skeptics MORE LIKELY To Be Eco-Friendly Than Climate Change Alarmists

 

About the author